Why States Should Adopt UCC Article 2A

The leasing of large scale items ranging from oil-drilling platforms to automobiles is big business in this country, with an estimated dollar volume reaching $150 billion. Yet the laws governing leasing have not kept pace with the intricacies of today's leasing arrangements, resulting in considerable uncertainty for lessors and lessees alike.

To fill this gap, the Uniform Law Commissioners approved a new article to the Uniform Commercial Code: Article 2A Leases. UCC2A provides for the fundamentals of the leasing contract, including the formation of the contract, provisions for express and implied warranties, and damages for breach of a leasing contract.

Historically, we have thought of financed purchase transactions as conditional sales. As sales, such transactions fall under the UCC, particularly Articles 2 and 9. But a leasing transaction, even though very similar to a conditional sale in many ways, is not clearly subject to the UCC. The rights and remedies of the lessor and lessee, therefore, are not well defined, and courts have characterized these transactions differently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Many troubling issues have been extensively and confusingly litigated.

UCC2A gives leasing transactions an appropriate underpinning in the law. Because of the broad similarities between lease and sales transactions, that underpinning is largely derived from the sales article of the UCC Article 2. Hence the new article is 2A, indicating its relationship to Article 2. Article 2 has been adopted in every state except Louisiana.

There are a number of reasons all states should adopt UCC Article 2A, Leases:


Since leases are an important part of business and commercial law, they should be governed by the Uniform Commercial Code. Further, the leasing business is interstate in character. Uniformity is as important to the conduct of leasing transactions as it is to sales transactions.


Perhaps the most important question answered in UCC2A is when leases are subject to UCC Article 9 on "Secured Transactions." Certain lease contracts establish what effectively are conditional sales, in which the lessor is no different from a creditor subject to Article 9.

The prior law has never effectively dealt with the issue, and concrete standards are established in UCC2A and an accompanying amendment to UCC-1-201(37), which is a basic definition section in the UCC. Under these provisions, a secured transaction occurs when the lessor has no meaningful residual rights in goods when the lease expires. In a true lease, the rights to the goods revert to the lessor when the lease term ends. But if the contract terms indicate that the rights to this residue are valueless, then it can be inferred that the lease really amounted to a conditional sale of the goods. Article 9 then should and would apply.


UCC2A creates a separate category of leases called "finance leases" to eliminate existing confusion over the rights of parties in such leases. Finance leases are characterized by the unique position of the lessor ─ as purchaser of goods only for the purpose of delivering them to a lessee pursuant to a lease contract.

Because the lessor is not the real supplier of the goods, and acts merely to finance the goods in the hands of the lessee, certain of lessee's rights are best served by imposing obligations on the real supplier and by limiting some rights against the lessor. UCC2A does not give a lessee implied warranties against a lessor in a finance lease, but passes the lessor's warranties against the real supplier under Article 2 on the lessee.

UCC2A also further limits a lessee's already limited rights to reject goods, once accepted under the contract, or to cancel, terminate, modify, excuse or substitute performance under the lease contract. The lessee relies upon warranty rights against the supplier, and the lessor is treated as the financing entity it really is.


Prior law does not provide clear remedies for leasing transactions. Because the parties to lease contracts share substantial characteristics with the parties to sales contracts, the full panoply of UCC Article 2 remedies can easily be translated and applied to lease contracts.

UCC2A not only provides clear measures of damages upon breach of contract, but also provides: clear standards for anticipatory repudiation by a party to a contract when anticipated performance by another party becomes insecure; for rejection of goods that do not conform to the contract; for excused non-performance of the contract; and for specific performance under appropriate circumstances.

UCC2A remedies carry over the original Article 2 policies of encouraging cure of default without litigation and of mitigation of damages whenever and wherever possible.


UCC2A establishes and standardizes warranties for true leases. It follows closely Article 2 of the UCC, but it does not protect title, since title remains with the lessor. Rather than title, UCC2A warrants against infringement with lease rights.

There are two kinds of implied warranties: merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Both are directly derived from Article 2 of the UCC. The warranty of merchantability assures the resalability of goods between merchants. The fitness warranty presumes a purpose and reliance upon the lessor to supply goods fit for the purpose. These warranties can be excluded or modified by agreement.

UCC2A implied warranties do not apply to finance leases. In that case the implied warranties under Article 2 of the supplier to the lessor are passed on to the lessee.


UCC2A defines a consumer lease as a lease in which the lessee takes the lease primarily for a personal, family or household purpose, when the total payments do not exceed $25,000. UCC2A does provide some protection for lessees in a consumer lease. Among other things, there is a burden on the lessor to justify acceleration of rentals in a consumer lease. But most consumer protection is left to other laws.


UCC2A settles recurring problems of what to do with leased goods that become fixtures and accessions and who has priority in each case.

Fixtures are defined as "goods so related to particular real estate that an interest in them arises under real estate law." Generally, if goods are leased and become fixtures, the lessor with prior interest in them has priority over those with the real estate interests ─ if the lessor perfects his or her prior interest with a fixture filing under UCC Article 9.

An accession occurs when leased goods are "installed in or affixed to other goods." Any existing rights in a lease contract are superior to any rights in the whole in which leased goods become accession after the lease contract is entered.


The changes in leasing transactions in recent years make it clear that modernization is long overdue. States now depend on the common law to resolve disputes over lease contracts. This creates great uncertainty, particularly for companies that conduct business in more than one state, since case law conflicts from state to state. Additionally, some important issues have never been adequately addressed in the common law, and UCC2A answers these immediate needs.